Foursquare: Better Tool For Marketers or Stalkers?
If you have been reading this blog for awhile, you may be aware of the differences in opinions on the trendy geo-tagging application Foursquare here at Bailey Gardiner. I was first introduced to the application last year at the PRSA conference in San Diego, where event participants were checking-in and sharing information about events they were attending, and where they were hanging out afterward. Because I am one of those Twitter users that loves sharing good restaurants, great finds or cool experiences with my followers, I immediately jumped on the Foursquare bandwagon.
I’ll admit that it took me awhile to really like the application. But after a few months (and a high-energy fight for Mayorship of my local Target with other bloggers in the area) I began to really see Foursquare’s value. While I will agree with Jon that not everyone needs to know when I’m bra shopping, I do find it interesting to see other people’s patterns: where they like to shop and eat on a regular basis, and where they have gone so many times that they are mayor. Putting on the marketing hat, I also think it’s a great way to promote establishments and offer deals and specials to friends, clients and customers in your immediate area.
Recently, I had an appointment at my hair salon, and while I was waiting for my stylist, I checked-in via Foursquare. Being a proponent of supporting local businesses in my area, my main goal was to give my salon a virtual “shout out.” After checking-in, I received a sponsored coupon from a small, local establishment down the street; they were offering a half-off deal for people checking in. Having seen these specials before from larger corporations such as Starbucks and Chili’s, I was really excited to see a local bar embracing this form of marketing. Thinking of the positive aspects of Foursquare, I started mentally writing this blog post in my head.
Then about half-way through my appointment, I received an email from an address I didn’t recognize saying they were just one town north and asking if they could “come down and see my hair.” Since this was to my personal email, I asked if this person was someone I knew. It wasn’t, and the proposition that followed made me realize that this person knew more about me than I was comfortable with. And worse – this person knew my exact location at that moment.
Cyber-stalking isn’t new, but the tools have changed. With Facebook about to roll out its geo-tagging service, and Twitter and Yelp also offering “check-in” abilities, one has to wonder how this will compromise people’s privacy – and even safety – in the future. The Daily Beast posted an article recently about a story similar to mine, but this time the “stalker” called the restaurant the user had checked in to and harassed her verbally over the phone. Quoted in the article, Foursquare counters that the service is meant to alert your friends about your location and that broadcasting the information over Twitter is just an option. And while that is true, keeping it a closed network isn’t the intent or desire of these technologies since the monetization of their services is based on the broad, open reach that “check-ins” can offer.
I’m torn. As a PR professional, we want people to use these tools to tell the world that they are at an event that we organized, or are shopping or eating at a client’s establishment. There is a distinct value of users broadcasting that they are thrilled to be trying out a new restaurant or that a particular store has a fabulous sale going on. But as a user, now concerned over her and her family’s personal safety, I will definitely think twice before checking in.
What do you think? Do you have any ideas about how to use these tools for marketing to a large audience yet still be safe to the individual user?











Yesterday, when 
